package ppx_compare
Install
Dune Dependency
Authors
Maintainers
Sources
sha256=dda97126c559d5b8bb6d60e26522b2ee8c22ca8b85a111a3235b15d17d5a0ace
md5=22a964d71574a6bc0d6cab21199fe460
Description
Part of the Jane Street's PPX rewriters collection.
Published: 22 Mar 2018
README
ppx_compare
Generation of fast comparison functions from type expressions and definitions.
Ppx_compare is a ppx rewriter that derives comparison functions from type representations. The scaffolded functions are usually much faster than ocaml's Pervasives.compare
. Scaffolding functions also gives you more flexibility by allowing you to override them for a specific type and more safety by making sure that you only compare comparable values.
Syntax
Type definitions: [@@deriving compare]
Expressions: [%compare: TYPE]
and [%compare.equal: TYPE]
Record fields: [@compare.ignore]
Basic usage
We use ppx_deriving
/ppx_type_conv
, so type definitions are annotated this way:
type s = v * w [@@deriving compare]
This will generate compare_s : s -> s -> int
function that relies on compare_v : v -> v -> int
and compare_w : w -> w -> int
.
Compare is not DWIM (do what I mean): it will scaffold a fast well behaved comparison (reflexive, transitive, symmetric...) function however it does not try to follow any "natural ordering". For instance arrays of characters are not sorted lexicographically.
Base types (options,int,array,lists,char,floats...) have the same comparison order as Pervasives.compare (provided their type parameters also do for the polymorphic ones).
Records fields are compared in the order they are defined (left to right); tuples fields are compared left to right. When we compare two branches of a sum whichever ones comes first in the definition is considered lowest. Variants compare in the order they are listed (increasing top-to-bottom). Polymorphic variants use the same ordering as the ocaml runtime.
Calling compare
for type t
s
In compliance (or conformance) with Janestreet's coding standard we assume that type named t
are the main types in a module and
type t = S.t * T.t [@@deriving compare]
will call the functions S.compare
and T.compare
instead of calling S.compare_t
and T.compare_t
. This will also generate a compare : t -> t -> int
function.
Signature
type t [@@deriving compare]
in a module signature will add val compare : t -> t -> int
in the signature.
Comparison without a type definition
Sometimes you just want a comparison without having to create a new type. You can create such a comparison function using the [%compare: ..]
extension point:
let gt x y = [%compare: float * int * [`A | `B | `C] ] x y
You can use the type _
, in which case the corresponding values will be ignored (i.e. compared using fun _ _ -> 0
). For instance:
assert ([%compare: _ list] [ true ] [ false ] = 0);
assert ([%compare: _ list] [] [ false ] <> 0);
You can also check for equality using [%compare.equal: ..]
, which produces a function that returns true
precisely when [%compare: ..]
returns 0
.
Special support for record fields
The comparison ignores record fields which are annotated with [@compare.ignore]
.
type t =
{ a : float [@compare.ignore]
; b : string
}
[@@deriving compare]
Dependencies (5)
-
ppxlib
>= "0.1.0" & < "0.3.0"
-
ocaml-migrate-parsetree
>= "1.0" & < "2.0.0"
-
jbuilder
>= "1.0+beta18.1"
-
base
>= "v0.11" & < "v0.12"
-
ocaml
>= "4.04.1"
Dev Dependencies
None
Used by (18)
-
bin_prot
= "v0.11.0"
-
biocaml
>= "0.4.0"
- camlix
-
frenetic
>= "5.0.0" & < "5.0.5"
- h1_parser
- http
-
inferno
>= "20220603"
-
little_logger
< "0.2.0"
-
nsq
>= "0.2.5" & < "0.5.2"
- oci
- opine
-
ppx_assert
= "v0.11.0"
-
ppx_bap
< "v0.14.0"
-
ppx_base
= "v0.11.0"
-
ppx_expect
>= "v0.11.0" & < "v0.12.0"
-
ppx_hash
>= "v0.11.0" & < "v0.12.0"
- prettiest
-
string_dict
< "v0.12.0"
Conflicts (1)
-
jbuilder
= "1.0+beta19"